A Typewriter in Kenya, and the Need for Global Justice Journalism
Published October 28, 2009 @ 03:51PM PT
The Global Post -- an excellent source of news from around the world -- ran a story recently on a Kenyan prison with a paralegal class and a single typewriter.
It's an inspiring -- and frustrating -- story. A Christian legal organization called CLEAR runs a paralegal training class in Kenya's Kisumu prison. Prisoners help one another with appeals and they learn a trade they'll be able to practice once they're released.
But here's the frustrating part: the prison office has a single typewriter, and every appeals goes through it. Since appeals in Kenya need to have seven copies, it takes a while to get a single document written. The appeals process was paralyzed recently when the typewriter broke down.
This case tells us a great deal about justice in the developing world, and I've written before about how something as simple as paperwork can cause terrible injustices. But I want to focus for a moment on the reporting itself.
Sidestepping Immigration to Focus on Solving Crimes
Published October 28, 2009 @ 06:28AM PT
When federal and local officials work on identifying, detaining and deporting undocumented immigrants, there's something else they're not doing: investigating, solving and preventing crime.
A great op-ed yesterday in the Los Angeles Times by LAPD Chief William Bratton makes a forceful and eloquent case for police departments to keep their priorities straight.
Police officers should concentrate their energy on solving crime, and undocumented immigrants shouldn't be afraid to come into contact with police if they witness a crime, or even more importantly, if they are the victims of a crime.
Unfortunately, police departments across the country are moving in the opposite direction. More than 65 law enforcement agencies across the county have entered into a partnership with the federal government, called 287(g). This program gives police officers the power to act as agents of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, a monumentally bad idea. Bratton argues, rightly, that this program takes critical emphasis away from crime investigation and prevention.
A Community Option for Alabama Juveniles
Published October 27, 2009 @ 03:24PM PT
It was the tough-on-crime, war on drugs 1970s and 1980s. America feared a dangerous outbreak in juvenile crime, and lawmakers cracked down -- passing legislation to ensure that kids were incarcerated for breaking the law -- even if they were non-violent first-time offenders.
Alabama's prison system grew faster than the rest of country during the tough-on-crime years, but not by much. From 1977 to 2000 Alabama prisons grew by 373%, compared to 364% for the country as a whole. We were all swept up in the hysteria.
Well, things are definitely changing, in Alabama and elsewhere. Last year, Alabama legislators passed laws requiring judges to choose community sentences and other alternatives to incarceration for non-violent juvenile offenders. This means kids who make a mistake might have a chance to stay with their families, stay in school, get some special training -- the opportunities that research shows actually prevents crime later in life.
Two Posthumous Pardons in South Carolina
Published October 27, 2009 @ 07:07AM PT
Last week, the South Carolina pardon board voted unanimously to clear the names of two men executed in 1915 for a murder they may not have committed. The men -- Meeks and Thomas Griffin -- were great uncles of syndicated radio talk show host Tom Joyner (left), who sought the pardons after learning last year about the men’s story.
It was the first posthumous pardon ever granted in a capital case by the state of South Carolina.
I wrote about this case a couple of weeks ago, and I’m excited to be able to report on this positive outcome. Joyner was delighted with the news:
“It’s good for the community, it’s good for the nation. Anytime you can repair racism in this country is a step forward,” he said.
Pot and the Safe Driving Myth
Published October 26, 2009 @ 06:19AM PT
Advocates for marijuana reform frequently argue that the drug should be legalized because it's safe. This is generally true, and I support legalization for this and many other reasons. But when it comes to driving and safety, legalization advocates often go a step too far -- claiming that driving under the influence of marijuana is not dangerous and that marijuana causes zero deaths each year. These misleading arguments are harming the reform movement.
It's a fact: marijuana impairs driving ability. Reliable scientific studies have shown that marijuana usage causes slower reaction time, impairs eye tracking and lateral awareness and that drivers fail to reliably regulate speed and the distance between their car and the car ahead of them. Driving ability is especially bad when the a person has smoked recently. The authors of the recent book "Marijuana is Safer" agree that driving while high shouldn't be condoned, though they focus on the decreased risk when driving high is compared to driving drunk.
It's true: driving drunk is worse than driving high. Legalizing marijuana may lead to a decrease in drunk driving deaths, and this is a good thing. But it's no reason to turn a blind eye to driving under the influence of drugs. We should be working now to advocate against ever driving under the influence of pot, and when marijuana is legalized, tax income from pot sales could be used in part to support a public awareness campaign about the dangers of driving under the influence of marijuana.
Rape is not a Preexisting Condition
Published October 25, 2009 @ 11:51AM PT
We need health care reform in this country for so many reasons, one of which is to ensure that victims of crime get the treatment they need.
The Huffington Post Investigative Fund reported horrifying tales of several women who were denied health insurance because they had received treatment after being the victims of sexual assault. I read this piece right after a great post by change.org Women's Rights blogger Jen Nedeau explaining how just being a woman can be considered a pre-existing condition and detailing instances of discrimination against women by insurers.
Both posts managed to make me angry, and both should serve as reminders of why the fight for health care reform needs our support. No one should be denied coverage, because of their gender or any other reason. Denying a person healthcare because he or she received treatment following a sexual assault is terrible and it's wrong.
Arizona Seeks to Privatize its Prisons
Published October 24, 2009 @ 12:56PM PT
Arizona officials are planning to seek bids to privatize the state's entire prison system, handing over the keys to nine of the state's 10 prisons -- including death row -- to private company like the Corrections Corporation of America. If this doesn't sound like bad enough idea, a 'savings-sharing' scheme behind the plan makes it even worse.
This plan has been circulating in Arizona for some time, but I haven't covered it here until now, because I didn't want to sound the alarm for something I thought seemed too insane to ever actually happen. But a front-page story in today's New York Times forced me to pay a bit more attention. (Thanks to reader and activist Camille Tilley for keeping me in the loop as this issue developed over the last few months).
- 83,515
-
Categories
Writers
Matt Kelley
Chris Cassidy
About Criminal Justice
-
Office Manager
Equal Justice USA -
View More Jobs
Post a Job »
-
-
Drug Policy Alliance
-
7360 Supporters
-
-
-
National Legal AID And Defender Association
-
84 Supporters
-
