Criminal Justice

Barney Frank on Legalizing Pot

Published July 15, 2009 @ 06:28AM PT

In a new interview with NORML, U.S. Rep. Barney Frank discusses his bill decriminalizing marijuana possession, and small non-profit sales of the drug, under federal law. He's a realistic guy: the bill is modestly worded to give it the best chance of passing, he introduced it with co-sponsors on both sides of the aisle, and he still doesn't expect it to pass. But a sensible conversation would be a start, and Americans are ready for it. A new CBS poll finds 41 percent of Americans want the drug to be fully legal.

Here are some excerpts from Frank's conversation with Esquire's John H. Richardson:

ESQUIRE: Could you tell me why you're doing it at this time? Everybody says you guys have got so much to handle right now.

BARNEY FRANK: Announcing that the government should mind its own business on marijuana is really not that hard. There's not a lot of complexity here. We should stop treating people as criminals because they smoke marijuana. The problem is the political will.

ESQ: That's my second question. There's already been a lot of change in the country. Thirteen states have decriminalized pot. What's holding up Congress?

BF: This is a case where there's cultural lag on the part of my colleagues. If you ask them privately, they don't think it's a terrible thing. But they're afraid of being portrayed as soft on drugs. And by the way, the argument is, nobody ever gets arrested for it. But we have this outrageous case in New York where a cop jammed a baton up a guy's ass when he caught him smoking marijuana.

ESQ: Why is the bill so modest? You explicitly say you're not going to overturn state laws.

BF: Because I think it's important, when you're confronting political opinions this way, to make it easier for people. This isn't for drug dealers. Although I do think there's a logic that once you've allowed people to smoke, you're going to go beyond that.

Read more about the Act to Remove Federal Penalties for Personal Use of Marijuana by Responsible Adults.

Related Posts

Comments (52)

  1. Christine Christian

    Actually, I think the polls underestimate the numbers of people that approve of legalizing marijuana.  I've been somewhat shocked and surprised at the numbers of people I talk to who express that they have changed their minds after recent discussions on network TV AND with the reports of killings in Mexico threatening to escalate northward.  I've even been told by former stalwart opponents of legalization that we should move to legalize ALL drugs and educate our children about the dangers of ALL drugs including prescription medications.  It seems that the facism under which we've been living for 35 years is finally turning the corner and Americans will be free to make their own choices again.  It's about time.

    Keep up the Good Work Barney and thank you.

    Posted by Christine Christian on 07/15/2009 @ 12:18PM PT

  2. Michael Maloney

    The poll you see above is highly inaccurate. In fact, it almost looks made up compared to CNN's poll a couple months ago or MSNBC's poll from last winter. The poll above looks like something FoxNEWS came up with in their "Arts,Crafts, & Fictional Information Department".

    Posted by Michael Maloney on 07/19/2009 @ 12:44AM PT

  3. Reply to thread
  4. mikey  johnson

    We need to dramatically shift how we are dealing with drug abuse in America if we ever want to make a dent in it. I applaud Mr. Frank's foresight on this issue. Lately more and more of his colleagues have been following his example and opening up to the idea of legalizing and regulating marijuana. We need to continue pressuring our elected officials that the failed policy of prohibition cannot continue. In so many different ways, we cannot afford it.

    Posted by mikey johnson on 07/15/2009 @ 12:38PM PT

  5. Clayton Cleverly

       The FAILED 'War on Drugs' has been four decades in the losing. As it stands, we have more than twice the number of people in jail than most of the rest of civilization COMBINED. We spend FAR too much money persecuting individuals who use cannabis.

       The VAST majority of us are hard-working, tax-paying, home-owning, CITIZENS, who simply prefer to relax with a different plant than tobacco, or alcohol. A plant that has proven to be LESS addictive than CAFFEINE. That's right, coffee is more physically addictive than cannabis!

      However, cannabis CAN be habitual (emotionally addictive), but so can exercise! TV! The internet, gambling, alcohol, cigarettes, chewing tobacco, or SEX! Shall we ban those and their participants as well?

       With nearly a MILLION AMERICANS arrested every year (and subsequently unable to get a good job because they now have a DRUG RECORD), is the policy doing more harm than good? I think so. With 15,000,000 Americans admitting to using within the past month, if it were so detremental, wouldn't there be a whole lot MORE people in clinics or in jail? If it's so addictive, and the government is doing such a POOR job of protecting them from cannabis, how is it not MORE destructive?!

       And consider this, suppose we 'Won' the WoD tomorrow, arrested all 15 million folks who use cannabis semi-regularly, where would we HOUSE them? With 2.5 million Americans in overcrowded jails now, we would need to fund, and construct another SIX times as many prisons as we have now to keep them. IT WON'T WORK!! WE CAN'T AFFORD IT!

      In all honesty, cannabis is NOT a beneficial thing, if smoked, it does put a bunch of tar and carcinogens into your lungs (though it's also proven NOT to cause cancer), and is not the healthiest way to ingest THC.

       But this is America, and we're supposed to have the RIGHT to a 'pursuit of happiness' aren't we? If my happiness involves occasionally ingesting the smoke from one of nature's plants (though not tobacco), what business is it of yours? If I maintain my job, my house, my friends, my children, pay my taxes etc, and I HARM NO ONE ELSE, why stop me?! WHAT business is it of yours?!

      Stop persecuting stoners, we'd love to pay taxes on it, we'd love to be able to keep good jobs, we don't want to smoke and drive, nor smoke and work. We just want to stop being oppressed by folks who've been utterly misinformed about the detrimental affects of a pastime intoxicant of ours.

    Posted by Clayton Cleverly on 07/16/2009 @ 11:20AM PT

  6. Monica Morton

    I couldn't not have stated my own comments and beliefs better!  Thanks Clayton!

    Posted by Monica Morton on 07/17/2009 @ 07:12PM PT

  7. jowey styxx

    But fear and punishment is profitable. 

    If they make it legal what other excuse will they have to break down the doors of your house?  What about those poor pharmaceutical shareholders?  What will the private prison corporations do or the judges that take kickbacks?

    The dance between the "illegal" and "legal" is very profitable for the players.  I have seen on duty cops walk into parties to have a joint before going back out, at the time it startled me.  But as I learned the first thing one does for any successful enterprise is to establish a relationship with a pocket authority or cop...

    What will these people do if it is made legal, how about all those people in prison now, just like Gitmo....  Where would they go, where would they live?

    Posted by jowey styxx on 07/18/2009 @ 01:42PM PT

  8. Reply to thread
  9. Norman Gooding

     

    The continued imprisonment of non-violent victimless criminals is creating more problems than remedies,because of the expense,and avoided with today's technology and the use of house arrest,gps monitors and community service.

    The continued prohibition underwrites the existence of organized crime and the green market and the continued export of untaxed billions for something we can grow ourselves.

    The legalization of marijuana would also remove the regulations on hemp farming,availing us of so many jobs and opportunities for America that listing all of them is impossible.

    And finally,the legalization of marijuana rights a wrong,done to the American people in 1972,when a panel was asked to study marijuana and after doing so,their recommendations and findings were dismissed because our President decided he and his advisers knew what was best for America and declared War on the American people over a harmless plant. The indictment is against that President,and every president since his election and the anti-drug federal police that has perpetuated it and spent tax dollars to preserve it's own place at the tax trough.

     

    Posted by Norman Gooding on 07/16/2009 @ 04:32PM PT

  10. Toni Seger

    Has anyone asked themselves why marijuana was made illegal, in the 1930's after a couple millennia of legal use?

    The history is there for those who are interested.

    When it became clear that prohibition would be repealed, the liquor lobbies didn't want to compete with the far less harmful, naturally growing, inexpensive marijuana plant, so they devised a campaign of disinformation that persists to this day. Hypocritical politicians have been jumping on this train of opportunists for decades.

    And all the while we have paid for a ridiculously expensive, counterproductive war on marijuana that made criminals out of children, we've also subsidized the real killer; nicotine.

    Nicotine is one of the most addictive substances known to man. It's considered by many drug experts to be more physically addictive than heroin.

    I am not against legislation in relationship to drugs. I just want that legislation to make sense which it never has. Thank you Barney Frank for taking a step in that direction.

    Posted by Toni Seger on 07/17/2009 @ 07:29AM PT

  11. Norman Gooding

    Yes Toni,alcohol did support taxation of marijuana in the 30's,but the big lobby came from Randolph Hearst,newspaper magnate,because he had millions tied up in the pulpwood industry with thousands of acres of land leased and bought. He supported the exorbatant tax on marijuana,and used that to get hemp outlawed to remove his biggest competitor in the paper mfg industry. And the cotton growers were a big lobby that supported it,and of course the Ku Klux Klan supported it,for ethnic reasons. The KKK doesn't seem important now,but in the 30's,they were a large and powerful  organization that had many members in the legislature.

    And many of the sme lobbies support prohibition now for the same reason they do now,the competition for the buck.

    Not one organization that supports prohibition does so to protect your health or your life,but they make their monies from the lobbies and even the cartels and their rice bowl is empty if legalization happens. That is why all these new studies and fear mongering is going on now,they are clawing at any straw to keep their paycheck going.

    Posted by Norman Gooding on 07/18/2009 @ 08:19AM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 1 person likes this comment.   Like
  12. Toni Seger

    "Not one organization that supports prohibition does so to protect your health or your life..."

    Absolutely true which is why organized crime is probably the biggest supporter of drug prohibition. It keeps them in business.

    The legalization of marijuana would remove one of the greatest hypocrises I have ever witnessed. Law enforcement has been horribly corrupted by drug laws that create such massive profits for the people who are supposed to be policing those laws, they simply don't resist enriching themselves.

    Marijuana laws have also appealed to a segment of the population that wants to believe 'just say no' is a viable policy. The real effect of these laws, however, is actually quite dark because marijuana laws are so wrong, they've created cynicism and disrespect for the law within our population. Exactly the opposite of what they're supposed to accomplish.

    Posted by Toni Seger on 07/18/2009 @ 08:40AM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 1 person likes this comment.   Like
  13. Reply to thread
  14. Paul von Hartmann

    The main reasons to end prohibition:

    1. Cannabis is both unique and essential.

         a. The only common seed with three essential fatty acids.

         b. The only crop that produces both fuel and food from the same harvest.

         c. Potentially the most globally available organic agricultural resource.

         d. The crop that produces the most monoterpenes, for mitigating climate instability.

    2. Prohibition is counter-productive to its own stated objectives. -- i.e. "Forbidden fruit is always sweeter" (and more expensive) therefore more attractive to rebellious teens.

    3. Freedom to farm "every herb bearing seed" is the first test of religious freedom.

    See 

    http://californiacannabisministry.blogspot.com/

    for more

    Posted by Paul von Hartmann on 07/17/2009 @ 08:35AM PT

  15. Kenneth Snyder

    All I can say is it's about damn time! Yay Barney, you have Colorado's support

    Posted by Kenneth Snyder on 07/17/2009 @ 09:38AM PT

  16. Stephen Thomas

    Stop the damn lies with these polls...way more people support it then they want us to believe ill put my life on that stated fact too as a pure fact!!!! I cant wait till karma finally rolls back a powerful swing and knocks out those old dried up sewer rats and politics for all these years of manipulating the public with false information thats ruined many lives of my brothers ill never get to know. Society is wakeing up and fast and if something doesint change they they government wont have the power to retaliate if People like us decide its not worth keeping around like some scare crow that can only make crows laugh -----remember everybody the government is just words and people nothing more nothing less and the real differences come from People like Mikey who I never met but I know hes a good guy. Please wake up people cause congress cant get enouth sleep

    Posted by Stephen Thomas on 07/17/2009 @ 11:17AM PT

  17. Ainsley Jo Phillips

    I'm definitely no stoner and haven't ingested marijuana in any way so far as I know (unless it got slipped to me in a brownie or something).  In fact, I used to think that it should remain illegal. 

    No more!  Now that I've learned the truth, I've gone in the opposite direction. 

    I still haven't used any and have no plans on becoming a recreational stoner.  However, I would hope that this would be a legal option for me should I develop a condition where I was in a lot of pain.

    Think about this:  Had marijuana not had all of those lies and distorted truths making it illegal all of these years, Michael Jackson, Elvis, and many others would, likely, still be alive today!

    Posted by Ainsley Jo Phillips on 07/17/2009 @ 11:30AM PT

  18. Brent In Kentucky

    This effects every single American, they are at War on Citizens and dont think because you dont smoke or that you have for so long without issues that it wont be you one day.

    All it takes is one snich, trying to get off of some offence, to name your home as a marijuana anything and before you know it you will be on the floor, your animals dead, kids scared and being removed from the home, wife crying in handcuffs and guns in your face. It happens all day long, every day, in every state. In fact it just happened to a mayor of a town in Penn. His mother in law was handcuffed and sat down in a pool of the dogs blood. The Mayors home!

     

    The funny thing is when they bust marijuana users they are calm and follow direcions they dont need the shock treatment, they are at War with all of us, dont think it couldnt happen to you!

     

    Second note, HEMP, It could save our way of life, from fuel to biochemicals or food and medicines to paper and cloth, 5000+ uses and you want to bet why they dont want it around?

     

     Think of all the indusries keeping prohibition alive simply for their own profit. Textile, Big Pharm, Petrochemical, Petrolium, OIL, Corn, Paper, Cotton, Alcohol, and tobacco, they all have a stake in wheather or not Cannabis/Marijuana and Hemp are Prohibited or not!

     

    Its going to take all of us and everyone we know to get off their collective Butts and start writting and calling these legislators, that get all their money for these big industries that dont want to change anything, we need to tell them to, END Prohibition or we will vote you out next time around! Its the only way!

    Posted by Brent In Kentucky on 07/17/2009 @ 12:16PM PT

  19. Lana Little

    Why did you take this story off of Change.org's email list?  It was the "top" article on your first batch of emails that were sent off, and now it is suspiciously missing on the later batch.  I know this because I have two email addresses and I always receive this email at one address a few hours before I receive the same email at my other.  Did you think people wouldn't notice?

    My suspicion is that there are too many comments from readers exposing the ridiculousness and absurdity of pot being illegal.

    Certain people do not want the sheep to wake up.

    Censor away.  It is to no avail anyway.  Just makes you look guiltier to us enlightened people.

    Posted by Lana Little on 07/17/2009 @ 12:26PM PT

  20. Matt Kelley

    We include content in our weekly emails based on each member's activity and membership in various causes on the site.

    You received different versions of the email because your different email addresses are connected to different causes on change.org.

    Posted by Matt Kelley on 07/17/2009 @ 03:36PM PT

  21. Lana Little

    Sounds like a sensible answer.  However, I am entirely INACTIVE on my other change.org account, and not once have I ever received two different emails (essentially the same emails, but missing the TOP story).  If marijuana is one of your top stories, it should be sent to EVERYONE, not just to those who are interested.  How else is "CHANGE" going to be enacted? 

    I'm not interested in stupid Sotomayer or "Evangelizing to the Homeless", but you didn't remove those stories from my other email alert, even though I was not active on those causes. 

    What I'm trying to get at is- you did give me a sensible answer as to why "Decriminalizing Marijuana" was erased from the email alert and not sent to my other email account- however, I simply do not believe it.   

     

     

     

    Posted by Lana Little on 07/20/2009 @ 06:58AM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 1 person likes this comment.   Like
  22. Reply to thread
  23. Lee Gaylord

    I have seen studies that say it is not addicting, It does not lead to more dangerous drugs and others that are used to legalize it.

    Studies can be done to say what you want.  To me the only study that is good is the streets and the study of life by watching life.

    Almost all of the crack users I know started with Marijuana.  Most Marijuana users I know are addicted to it.  I know people in prison for murder while being under the influence of Marijuana.

    Is it as bad as alcohol?  Yes. 

    Is it more addictive than alcohol? Yes.

    Is it as addictive as crack?  No.

    Should it be legalized?  I don't know.  If we try it there is no backing out and recriminalizing it.

    what worries me is if we do legalize it then the other drugs will be legalized soon after.

    I have many friends who have died because of drugs,  some were murdered, some got bad drugs and most died from the use of the drugs.  That includes alcohol and marijuana.

    Posted by Lee Gaylord on 07/17/2009 @ 01:51PM PT

  24. Toni Seger

    "Almost all of the crack users I know started with Marijuana."

    I'm sure they did and I'll bet you almost all the murderers in our jails started out drinking milk, but I don't think it's a reason to make milk illegal.

    I'm sorry you have lost friends because of drugs. The best thing you could do to prevent that happening is to fight for the legalization of drugs so that they can be regulated and controlled.

    As long as drugs remain illegal, they are outside the control of government and under the control of organized crime which is very invested in maintaining current drug laws.

    Posted by Toni Seger on 07/17/2009 @ 02:09PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 6 people like this comment.   Like
  25. Clayton Cleverly

    "Almost all of the crack users I know started with Marijuana."

    No they didn't, they started with mother's milk, and maybe formula. ALONG THE WAY they sampled marijuana. With 15,000,000 Americans using Marijuana in the last month, and less than 1,000,000 using any harder drugs, it CAN'T be a gateway drug. a 'gateway' is a small entrance to a MUCH larger environment. Cannabis is VASTLY more popular than harder drugs, therefore it CAN NOT be a gateway. But way to regurgitate flawed theories.

    "Is it as bad as alcohol?  Yes. "

    How? Alcohol is a poison. You can die simply from drinking too much alcohol. Those who drink become more aggressive and violent. My father was killed by a drunk driver when I was 5. I have NEVER been harmed by anyone who smoked cannabis. Cannabis is the exact opposite of alcohol. You CANNOT overdose. Your comment is inaccurate, and simply without merit.

    "Is it more addictive than alcohol? Yes."

    I'd love to see ANY scientific proof you have of that. All evidence I have seen indicates it is less addictive than caffeine, which makes COFFEE more addictive.

    "Most Marijuana users I know are addicted to it."

    You must not know many then. It is essentially NOT physically addictive, there is ZERO withdrawal. While it can be emotionally addictive, so can numerable other things. Is it the fault of the substance that the imbiber can't handle it? What about those addicted to the internet? texting? TV? Sex?

    Way to simply spew misinformation, just as we've asked folks not to.

    Posted by Clayton Cleverly on 07/17/2009 @ 02:47PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 4 people like this comment.   Like
  26. Ainsley Jo Phillips

    PleasePleasePleasePleasePleeeeeeeeease!!!  Don't criminalize the Internet!  I'd go bonkers!!!  Wonder what my gateway to the Internet might be?  Snail-mail?  Telephone?  Socializing face-to-face? Creative writing class?

    Posted by Ainsley Jo Phillips on 07/17/2009 @ 03:08PM PT

  27. Zander Meyers

    Your logic is a classic example of the fallacy of affirming the consequent.  For example, all monkeys eat bananas, therefore if you eat bananas, you're a monkey (obviously untrue).  Even if all crackheads started on weed, this does not mean that all weed smokers will become crackheads.

    I'm curious about where you get your information.  No reliable source can honestly conclude that weed is more health-damaging that alcohol, as it simply isn't true.  As well, no reliable source can conclude that it's as addictive as alcohol, because it isn't.

    You most likely encounter LOTS of weed-smokers every day whose lives don't suffer b/c of their abuse... you just don't realize that they're smokers, since they don't fit your preconcieved profile of a weed smoker.

    Posted by Zander Meyers on 07/17/2009 @ 04:46PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 3 people like this comment.   Like
  28. Zander Meyers

    Your logic is a classic example of the fallacy of affirming the consequent.  For example, all monkeys eat bananas, therefore if you eat bananas, you're a monkey (obviously untrue).  Even if all crackheads started on weed, this does not mean that all weed smokers will become crackheads.

    I'm curious about where you get your information.  No reliable source can honestly conclude that weed is more health-damaging that alcohol, as it simply isn't true.  As well, no reliable source can conclude that it's as addictive as alcohol, because it isn't.

    You most likely encounter LOTS of weed-smokers every day whose lives don't suffer b/c of their abuse... you just don't realize that they're smokers, since they don't fit your preconcieved profile of a weed smoker.

    Posted by Zander Meyers on 07/17/2009 @ 04:46PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 2 people like this comment.   Like
  29. mikey  johnson

    Where are you getting your information from? How is marijuana as addictive or harmful as marijuana? How?? Are you citing the violence that surrounds it's black market sale? Because that is a symptom of prohibition, not marijuana use.

    Posted by mikey johnson on 07/17/2009 @ 07:51PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 1 person likes this comment.   Like
  30. jeff brown

    There has never been a death attributed directly to marijuana use.  Maybe you should indulge and open your mind.

    Posted by jeff brown on 07/18/2009 @ 05:51AM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 2 people like this comment.   Like
  31. Timothy O'Dell

       Gateway drug. There is the problem right there.  The gateway is not a drug. Rules are the gateway. Make a rule and watch somebody break it.  The gateway is a natural rebelliousness to unjust rules.  It starts early in life and marijuana is a result of that rebellion the same as cigarettes, alcohol, or more intense substances, excessive masturbation, violent behavior, or any of the myriad other manifestations of frustration. You can't blame one for the other as they all spring from the same root cause.   Until hypocrisy is weeded out of every corner of our society we will not outgrow this reaction. The very laws against it promote it's use more effectively than anything else could have. And there is something to make you go hmm...  Hey, do you suppose they knew that when they made it illegal?  We had just come out of alcohol prohibition which created huge demand and drove up the price.  This is what they wanted.

       And don't hold your breath on this legalization show. It's an attempt to placate the many politically faithful who are crying out for justice. They have no intention of letting it really pass. It would cost them too much, politically and economically. Legalization will be won at the state, not federal level

    Posted by Timothy O'Dell on 07/18/2009 @ 12:28PM PT

  32. Christine Christian

    I'd like to address the Gateway Drug issue.  This is the way a drug lord operates:  he finds an area that he can potentially sell drugs in and he looks for likely candidates to recruit to sell those drugs for him.  He starts by selling a little bag of marijuana to someone he thinks might know more people to sell to.  At first, the guy has all the pot on hand that anybody could want.  A time or two later, he's a little short on pot but he has some gram bags of coke to throw into the deal.  For a few times more, the new dealer can buy a little pot and a lot of coke but after this introductory period, the pot portion of the deal gets smaller and smaller while the pile of other (and BTW, less desired) drugs beomes more plentiful:  extacy, heroin, LSD, Crack, Meth ad infinitum.  The preferred drug of choice (pot) becomes less and less available because the dealer makes a lot more money of selling hard drugs (that have addictive potential and a short turn around time) than he does off of selling pot.

    So, it's true that marijuana is a gateway drug - but, not for teens or other older regular users of pot - it's a gateway into our pocketbooks for the dealers and their pimps! 

    Take the teeth out of the drug cartel's profits by legalizing ALL drugs and putting the money into education and treatment.  Close that gateway and you won't see the majority of drug use escalate into hard-core addiction. 

    We all seem to realize that this drug should be legal - keep making the issue top of the list folks, they can't ignore facts forever and continue to get re-elected!

     

    Posted by Christine Christian on 07/21/2009 @ 10:33AM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 1 person likes this comment.   Like
  33. Christine Christian

    To Lee Gaylord:  Please don't post things about the addictive properties of marijuana and then say things like "I don't know"  You are obviously as ill-informed as our law-makers.  Marijuana *can be* psychologically addictive.  Study after study has shown that it is not, like caffiene, sugar, aspirin, ad infinitum, addictive. Please check your facts.

    It's just another side issue that is being thrown into the argument to distract us from demanding what we want from our law-makers.

    There is no doubt at all that the other drugs with which marijuana is scheduled are physically addictive substances but I ask you, should we ban a substance because we have a chronic need to make use of it?  What would happen to insulin users?  What would happen to COPD patients who cannot function without Albuterol?  Does *needing* a drug in order to be healthy enough to function, constitute addiction and if it does, do we need to *cure* all addictions?   

    Of course we don't.  When are we going start treating Americans like responsible adults instead of children who need to be protected from themselves?

    Posted by Christine Christian on 07/21/2009 @ 10:56AM PT

  34. Christopher Gulow

    In today's war on drugs...many people wanting to use marijuana get it from dealers that would rather get them hooked on more addictive substances such as crack/heroine/cocaine and if marijuana was legal you wouldn't have a pusher trying to pawn off such a harsh substance on you.

    I too have seen studies both saying addictive/nonaddictive you have to look at who is doing/paying for the study to see the truth behind the posted results.  Not everything you read in polls/studies is related to actual relality as numbers can be manipulated to say what you are wanting them to say.

    I smoked MarieJ way back in HS and found it easy to stop while drinking in the military was a lot harder to quit.  One being illegal and the other legal.  I am glad Representative Frank is bringing this up and I hope it doesn't die in committee as many bills do.

    As for the dangers of smoking Marijuana it can be utilized in other forms to benefit many problems, tinctures, foods, etc...avoiding any of the supposed lung issues, though much of that comes from the cigaretts and the garbage added by companies to keep smokers addicted.

    Posted by Christopher Gulow on 09/18/2009 @ 07:28AM PT

  35. Reply to thread
  36. ronnie dennies

    I hope they don't think that these statistics are even close to the number of people who smoke marijuana.The reason why I say this is because I know of at least 30 people who smoke marijuana and don't bother with taking polls or don't want to give their name out.

       I've turned a few to this site hoping to make a run for legalization.More and more people will start coming out of the closet saying they smoke MJ,it's just a matter of time.

    When you sit back and look at alll the things we are supposed to have,like freedom of speech,or just flat out freedom.Kinda like going to jail,Your technically guilty until proven innocent,yea you heard me right.I'm already guilty and have to prove my innocence,innocent till proven guilty.

    I sit back and see all these states that have legalized marijuana and all I can think about is what's good for the goose is good for the gander.I live in a non medicinal marijuana state(Louisiana) and I feel that everyone who was caught with their pants down for hurricane Katrina should have been given Marijuana for their stresses.I cannot begin to tell you what happened to a good bit of our(New Orleans,Chalmette,Metairie,etc)people.The world never heard about all the people who committed suicide because their brain was scrambled and couldn't properly think of their future without worrying what tomorrow holds,after their houses and lives were wiped out.Those who lost had no hope.

    Anyway,I await the day that will end alot of confusion in the US,and for the most part I strongly beleive that if marijuana was legalized,most people will stick to MJ and not choose to mess with other drugs.Gateway drug,my ass.Cigarettes and alcohol are the real gateway drugs,but oh yea,they are legal.Just don't add up.

    Posted by ronnie dennies on 07/17/2009 @ 02:09PM PT

  37. Otto VonAuchvetter

    I never will never use nonperscription drugs of any kind but making Marujuana legal will be one the greatest positve steps ever taken. The main thing, it will stabilize Mexico because of the cartels now being more powerful than the goverment. There will be less murders and less people involved in drug smuggling and so on. Another thing, the huge profit from taxes and sales will bring many states out of bankruptcy thus allowing money for schools and social services. Law enforcement will be free to combat vicious crimes. The sick and those in pain can find temprary relief without facing prison time. Yes to Marijuana.

    Posted by Otto VonAuchvetter on 07/17/2009 @ 08:37PM PT

  38. Ainsley Jo Phillips

    I *so* agree with all that you've said!  The day can't come soon enough for me!  I'm so sick to death of important programs (e.g. sports, music, art, drama, etc.) being cut at schools because of lack of funding--not to mention schools being closed down while kids are being put in overcrowded classrooms and "managed" with Ritalin.  Spending our tax-dollars on nanny laws that crowd our prisons and deprive sick people of pain relief is NOT a way that I want what I pay in taxes spent!

    Posted by Ainsley Jo Phillips on 07/17/2009 @ 09:06PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 3 people like this comment.   Like
  39. Reply to thread
  40. Betty Mulvihil

    Yes we need pot to be legalized. We do not mind payong taxes on it for its wonderful benefits. Stop persicuting the stoners,they are not criminals. Pot has good medicinal values. I know for a fact it helps cancer patients. Legalize pot. You will make the stoners happy and the tax on it will help with our giant deficit and maybe keep us from bankruptcy.

    Posted by Betty Mulvihil on 07/17/2009 @ 09:15PM PT

  41. Wendy Lange

    Yes we need to make marijuna legal for people  twenty-one & over weather using recreational or medically.  The War On Drugs has gone on far to long for so many of us. Predifent Obama is for change so let's make this happen.

    Posted by Wendy Lange on 07/17/2009 @ 11:55PM PT

  42. Norman Gooding

    Why is it that when you ask any adult over 18 if they trust their government,no one ever says yes?

    And yet,when the government spreads their lies and skewed studies trying to prove harm being caused by a harmless plant,that it takes a ball bat to knock the prohibition propaganda out of seemingly intelligent people.

    Posted by Norman Gooding on 07/18/2009 @ 08:32AM PT

  43. Paul Sharrard

    I recently was fired from my job for the only reason of testing positive for marijuana use. My former employer had no other problems with my work, actually I was commended on doing a good job and being reliable, unlike fellow co-workers that drank heavy over the weekend and failed to show up for work on Mondays. I take care of my responsibilities, feed and cloth my children and pay my bills. I do not steal or harm others and do not consider what I do on my back porch, on my own time a problem, nether did my employer until some test told them there was a problem. The test surly does not prove use on the job (cause there was none) and I agree that the work place is not the proper place for such activities. Really what's worse here? the fact that I sometimes smoke marijuana to relax and unwind or the fact I can no longer support my family?

    Posted by Paul Sharrard on 07/18/2009 @ 01:12PM PT

  44. Zander Meyers

    I'm so sorry to hear that.  I couldn't agree with you more.  I'm a teacher, and lucky that my school district doesn't drug test.  I, also, have been commended various times for doing good work.  I've always felt that the only reason to drug test should be if employers feel that something is making the quality of your work suffer.  There are actually numerous studies that prove that weed smokers often come up with the top-notch, outside-the-box ideas that employers love.

    Posted by Zander Meyers on 07/20/2009 @ 06:40PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 1 person likes this comment.   Like
  45. Reply to thread
  46. Gail Mc

    Thank you Barney Frank for having the guts to do what so many others won't do: defend everyday Americans over corporations and profit. It's rare and refreshing.

    Ending cannabis prohibition would give us the ability to be free on an independent and personal level to provide food, clothing fiber for paper and building, fuel, medicine and recreational opportunities for ourselves. It would effect the markets of energy (especially oil) textile, timber, food (especially soy) pharmaceutical, alcohol and tobacco. These are ALL very powerful lobbies in Washington, bent on protecting corporate profits and this is the REAL reason this plant was made illegal and remains illegal to this day.

    It's about freedom folks. You don't have to use this plant if you don't want to. Just stop standing in the way of people like me who want to utilize ALL aspects of this incredible plant that is therapeutically safer for you than aspirin.

    Posted by Gail Mc on 07/19/2009 @ 02:35AM PT

  47. Eric Jenkins

    Yeah, I'd say more like 60-70% of Americans want it legalized. This poll displayed is outdated/bias/innaccurate.

    Also, it's very important that the people and government have a good relationship, I mean, the government is there FOR the people so if the people are upset, then the government is definitely doing something wrong.

    So yeah, give us our well deserved freedom which we were born with. Stop treating us like children and let us choose how we live our lives and enjoy our free time.

    You'd think the government created life with all the rules and bounds they feel they have the right to create for us. It's time for change. It's time we take our freedom and country back and become "America the Free" once again.

     

     

    Posted by Eric Jenkins on 07/20/2009 @ 09:43AM PT

  48. mikey  johnson

    Where's the poll from a few months back that had "tax & regulate" at 50 or 51%? I'm confident that large scale nationwide poll done today would show a majority in favor of taxation and regulation. Although at this point I'd consider 60-70% pretty optimistic. In certain regions perhaps but I'd say realistically nationwide we're somewhere between 49-55%. A super-majority I'm sure is a few years off, although propably only about 10-15% of Americans are dead set against the idea.

    Posted by mikey johnson on 07/20/2009 @ 07:05PM PT

  49. Toni Seger

    I suspect a majority of Americans support legalizing, regulating and taxing marijuana, but are waiting for others to go out front about it.

    However, there are still very powerful people who would like to sabotage this and are eager to circulate dark tales of the ruinous nature of this extremely powerful drug that a handful of naive people mistakingly think is really mild...

    Witness this feature in the New York Times. Granted, it's the Style! section (What has this got to do with Style???) So, it's not journalism as most of us would define it. It's totally biased and more than a little unbelievable though its headline pretends to be balanced.

    Then, remember it's the NY Times that printed it... The one newspaper we're supposed to be able to trust...

    Posted by Toni Seger on 07/21/2009 @ 07:08AM PT

  50. Michael Crawford Jr.

    They graph and those percentige numbers are a lie. Its all propaganda to control us!I dont care what the number say LEGALIZE MARIJUANA you cant lie to us forever

    Posted by Michael Crawford Jr. on 07/21/2009 @ 12:21PM PT

  51. Paul von Hartmann

    Does our species possess sufficient coordinated will and functional intellect to recognize the true value of Cannabis agriculture, manufacture and trade in the context of 21st Century crises of environment, economics and social evolution? Ours is the first to face foreseeable synergistic collapse. How bad do things have to get before all solutions are considered?

    Time is the limiting factor in the equation of survival. It's the only thing we can't make more of. Every spring planting season that passes, without the critical benefits of Cannabis agriculture, is gone forever.

    If Cannabis agriculture can serve as a tool for carbon sequestration and  "radiative forcing" of the atmosphere,

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiative_forcing

    then should we not be at least studying the potential for Cannabis farming? Should we not at the very least be developing the seed varieties that will allow organic agriculture to surpass chemical agricultural practices in production of the world's best available source of organic vegetable protein?  

     

    I'm sure that most people would agree that "forbidden fruit is always sweeter (and more expensive)" when they see the peaceful experience of Cannabis tolerance in countries like Holland, Spain and Portugal. When every country respects the Cannabis culture as the world's most ancient and global, then the true value of this plant will bring a renaissance of health, abundance and spiritually genuine economics. 

    Unless spiritual dimensions of respect for nature are reintroduced into governance, against the tide of military-industrial-corporate-chemical socioeconomic intoxication, then our species will not see the end of this Century.

    It's our choice, to open the hemp seed or not. If you don't have fresh fertile Cannabis seed when the music stops, then you will be poor. Cannabis seed is nutritionally complete, unique and essential to optimum health and development. Ofcourse it's legal.

     

    Why would We The People give rightful jurisdiction over any "herb bearing seed" to the government, let alone a unique and essential "strategic food resource"?

    Executive Order 12919 - PART IX—GENERAL PROVISIONS, Sec. 901.

    http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/executive-orders/pdf/12919.pdf

    states that "hemp" is available by "essential civilian demand...irrespective 
    of other uses to which such commodities or products may be put." I have requested a protocol for essential civilian demand from the government, and as a Cannabis scholar, feel it is part of my individual responsibility to future generations to stand for the truth about Cannabis.

    I recommend that everyone watch this video on YouTube a hundred times, then take some money and invest it in the future of hemp fuels, foods, paper, cloth, biodegradable building materials and plastics, safe and effective herbal therapeutics, and put the agronomic tool to work that can save our bacon from being broiled by UV-B radiation.

    "Monoterpenes" are the molecule of the 21st Century. Google "global broiling" to find out some very good news about how to stop it. 

    Anyone who is interested in helping to make the shift in values necessary to avoiding extinction is invited to support "essential civilian demand" for Cannabis, under the protection of the First Amendment. I believe that this is the shortest route to Cannabis freedom upon which our survival truly depends.

    What's most needed is a comprehensive, objective, peer reviewed cost/benefit analysis of regional agricultural economics, inclusive of Cannabis. I suspect that the increased energy efficiency of regional organic biomass production can reduce demand for energy to the extent that everyone everywhere can grow all of their own fuel.

    If you'd care to consider, here's my BlogTalkRadio program of July 4th, 2009

    http://www.blogtalkradio.com/projectpeace

     

    Posted by Paul von Hartmann on 07/24/2009 @ 06:57AM PT

  52. Paul von Hartmann

    Posted by Paul von Hartmann on 07/24/2009 @ 07:01AM PT

  53. Lana Little

    Great post Paul von Hartmann, but unfortunately those people who have become very rich by basically owning the food and clothing industry would not be so rich if cannabis was legalized.  It is not so much the smoking that they care about, it is the loss of profits since hemp would create durable clothing and it is a healthy food source. 

    It's all about money.  This whole big ridiculous parade.

     

    Posted by Lana Little on 07/24/2009 @ 08:07AM PT

  54. Karen Kasey

    Legalize Pot!!!!!!!!!! Maybe than crime will go down.

    Posted by Karen Kasey on 07/24/2009 @ 01:05PM PT

  55. Toni Seger

    Actually Karen, you are right.

    It may be difficult for those who favor a drug war to understand, but legalizing and regulating drug use does eliminate a lot of the reason for the urban crime that is crippling municipal hospitals with gunshot wounds and the like.

    When a drug addict doesn't have to hold up a convenience store or mug someone to rob them in order to buy drugs; those crimes, wounds and/or fatalities don't take place.

    When drug related crimes don't have to happen, the people who didn't commit them don't have to go to jail where the prison population has been swelled by the drug war, but the people have not been made more safe by over incarceration.

    The war on drugs is more than a failure, it is an expensive catastrophe for law enforcement, the collapsing municipal budgets forced to pay for it and the burdened taxpayer who isn't getting their money's worth.

    Posted by Toni Seger on 07/24/2009 @ 01:24PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 1 person likes this comment.   Like
  56. Reply to thread
  57. Christina Keating

    MISSOURIANS DO NOT VOTE FOR ROY BLUNT!!!

    July 29, 2009

    Ms. Christina Keating
    *******
    Neosho, MO 64850

    Dear Christina:                          

    Thank you for your letter regarding H.R. 2943.  I appreciate the opportunity to respond to your concerns.

    Communication is a critical part of my job, and your involvement helps make the system run effectively.  As a representative of the people of Missouri it is important to hear the thoughts and concerns of all citizens so I am better able to serve the 7th Congressional district.

    On June 18, 2009, Congressman Barney Frank introduced H.R. 2943, the Personal Use of Marijuana by Responsible Adults Act of 2009.  This measure would eliminate most Federal penalties for possession of marijuana for personal use.  Currently, this legislation is under consideration in the House Judiciary and Energy and Commerce committees.

    I believe the proper role of the government is to discourage, at every opportunity, the use of drugs and all other substances that are detrimental to the health and well-being of individuals and society as a whole. Legalization of marijuana and other illegal substances would do just the opposite, and that is why I would oppose legislation attempting to change federal drug policy.

    Again, thank you for contacting me.  I look forward to hearing from you in the future.

    Sincere regards,

    Roy Blunt
    Member of Congress

    Posted by Christina Keating on 07/29/2009 @ 11:43AM PT

  58. Norman Gooding

    I would suggest that Blunt updates his resume. Him and every one of our elected officials that support the violence and the green market that underwrites the drug and anti-drug cartels.

    The anti-drug cartels are D.A.R.E.,Drug Free America,the DEA,NIDA and a multitude of organizations that only recieve their federal funding if drugs are kept illegal.

    (12) shall ensure that no Federal funds appropriated to the Office of National Drug Control Policy shall be expended for any study or contract relating to the legalization (for a medical use or any other use) of a substance listed in schedule I of section 202 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 812) and take such actions as necessary to oppose any attempt to legalize the use of a substance (in any form) that--
    (A) is listed in schedule I of section 202 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 812); and
    (B) has not been approved for use for medical purposes by the Food and Drug Administration.

    The above mandate from congress to the ONDCP requires that he does anything required to keep marijuana illegal,including lieing,false studies and skewed data.

    The ONDCP and the DEA have approved studies on marijuana,only if their outlined agenda is to find harm or something dangerous about marijuana. And they have had several studies,revealed by the scientists involved,that have proven that marijuana is a medicine,but they will not publish or report the results,because it is illegal for them to do so,instead,even if a study showed that marijuana is a cancer blocking agent,they are required by law to procure a study that contradicts the findings of the study,or casts doubts to the veracity and findings of the study.

    And that very situation has already happened. A Dr Tashkin,while working at NIDA,did a study that was outlined to connect marijuana to cancer or COPD. After 8 years of study,they reported to the DEA that their was no connection,to either,from smoking marijuana,and that marijuana appeared to have some cancer blocking properties,according to their statistics,but that further studies should be done to verify.

    Those studies will never be done. Our own laws,written to protect big pharmacy,will not allow it.

    Posted by Norman Gooding on 08/02/2009 @ 07:34AM PT

  59. Micah Bramlett

    If the 15,000,000 plus and I say plus because in communities throughout America if you smoke even once a year you have friends that do, and they have friends and so on. With a little organization and commitment. The great American tradition of an act of defiance to fight for independence. It takes this 15,000,000 plus to go outside in the street and smoke where ever they live smoke with friends and friends of friends openly and what could really be done you can't arrest, jail, and imprison everyone. That would push this bill through. It would also change the way the American public was received by government.

    Posted by Micah Bramlett on 08/11/2009 @ 03:06AM PT

  60. evelyn rasco

    marijuana should be legalize it grows like a plant or food that we eat and it helps older people that have  alot of health  problems and people should not go to jail when they are smokeing in the private  of there home  and it does not cause crime to go up it is the hard drugs that people get on that make them commit a crime not smoke pot  so good job barney

    Posted by evelyn rasco on 08/17/2009 @ 06:05PM PT

Add a Comment

For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Author

Twitter Feed

Matt Kelley

Matt has worked and volunteered in various capacities in criminal justice reform for several years. When he's not blogging, he works as the Online Communications Manager at the Innocence Project. Views expressed here are Matt's, and don't represent the positions of the Innocence Project.

close

This user's Profile page is not public. They have restricted it to only their friends.

Already a Member?

Create an Account

You must create a Change.org account to complete this action. If you already have an account click here.

  Cancel