Hiding ‘Problem Prisoners’ to Pass Inspection
Published October 20, 2009 @ 03:48PM PT

A fresh scandal in the U.K. reveals that officers at two London prisons routinely shuffled prisoners between facilities in order to pass inspections.
Reports released today from an independent examiner find that the practice -- known as “ghosting” -- was commonly used at two London facilities, where prisoners were transferred from one to the other in anticipation of an audit, and then returned immediately after the review. Justice Secretary Jack Straw ordered a nationwide investigation.
The frequent moving of prisoners is a common practice around the world, and under normal circumstances it can be destructive -- interrupting medical care, education and positive relationships, moving prisoners far from families and support networks and causing violence by forcing prisoners to repeatedly prove themselves to new populations. But hiding prisoners from inspectors is a new low.
I’ve known people who have been moved more than ten times during a 15 year sentence -- some in New York call it the “upstate tour.” Of course, there can be legitimate reasons for moves as well -- prisoners can request transfers to facilities with certain programs or to avoid violent circumstances.
The U.K. practice was "disgraceful in its intent and its execution", British Justice Minister Jack Straw said. "In its misguided effort to present the prisons in a better light, it neglected one of the service's primary responsibilities - to treat those in its custody with decency and care.”
Some prison administrators fought back against the allegations, saying the reliance on ghosting and other tricks to avoid audits is a natural result of the bureaucratic culture of quotas and constant review under which they operate.
"The alleged transfer out of prisoners before an inspection is clearly regrettable but is understandable given the pressure that prisons are under to produce excellent results, inspection after inspection after audit," said Harry Fletcher, assistant general secretary of the probation union.
This scandal and increased awareness of constant prisoner moves in the U.S. and the U.K. should lead to more reasonable policies on this issue -- allowing prisoners to get the services they need without being constantly shuffled from one cell to the next.
Share this Post
Related Posts
-
Held Without Trial in Nigeria
-
1,500 Prisoners Freed in Zimbabwe
-
Going Beyond Band-Aids to Stop Suicides in French Prisons
Comments (2)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Email



















Kudo's to this post Matt.
This is an all too often overlooked devious action by administrators of the prison systems in this country. One of the other primary "reasons" for midnite transfers is not just to avoid audits, its to avoid a lawsuit, or as punishment for bringing legal actions against the administration. My personal experience within the system is a good example. After spending 6 months in the "Con-Air" transfer system due to my bringing legal actions on behalf of myself and others within the system, and then landing more than 1,000 miles from "home" I was blatantly told by the former administrators of the new digs where I was assigned to that "we do not care about your Constitutional rights here, you're in (a Federal Prison) and we do care about your lawsuits, we make paper airplanes out of them and throw them out the window and if we lose, we just pay you off with confiscated drug money." (Actual testimony from a counselor in a federal lawsuit).
It has been my experience throughout the ardious and lengthy battle with various administrators over the years, that transfers are a common practice to punish uncooperate prisoners, litigatious prisoners, to break up "gangs", or to avoid a ceiling cap on the population. Rarely does a transfer actually occur that brings prisoners closer to family, or to accomodate the prisoner's special needs, be it medical or therapeutic.
There are of course, legitimate transfers and I applaud the ideal of using the transfer system to bring family members closer to home. However, with the BOP population at more than 200,000, and state facilities housing upwards of 800,000, the management and control of the prison populations throughout the country becomes increasingly more difficult and onerously more expensive.
Gee, here's an idea, release non-violent first time prisoners and quit playing "ghosting" games with the public.
Posted by mark schmanke on 10/21/2009 @ 05:21AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Unbelievable article and I follow all this stuff. This is truly disgusting about a "free" country gone awry. What goes around comes around and we will work for change and reform.
Posted by Camille Tilley on 10/26/2009 @ 06:39PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.