Monday Map: American Drug Trafficking Corridors
Published July 06, 2009 @ 04:38PM PT

Despite our strict prohibition and overflowing prisons, the United States is the world's biggest consumer of illegal narcotics. All of those drugs somehow make it from the producer to the consumer, and today's map - from the DOJ's National Drug Intelligence Center - shows the most common routes traveled by drug traffickers to distribute marijuana, heroin, cocaine, meth and other drugs. Click here to see the map in more detail and click here for brand new analysis of high-density trafficking areas.
Americans spend more than $60 billion a year on illegal narcotics and another $20 billion trying to stop them. The map above is a simplified, abstract glance at drug routes, but it demonstrates the wide penetration of illegal drugs into our country and the hopelessness of efforts to prevent this flood. On a more granular level, these supply routes turn into a spider web that bring every type of drug into almost every town in the country.
Considering the sheer scale of drug supply operations in the U.S. leads us to some tricky questions, however. I often advocate on this blog for the legalization of marijuana, and - eventually - of all drugs. If we do that, what will the thousands of people in these intricate networks do for income? Will they resort to other, more dangerous, underground economies like human trafficking and guns? Will they reenter the mainstream economy? Will we create a new class of unemployed, untrained citizens?
I believe that if we legalized drugs, black markets and organized crime will not cease to exist, but they will be significantly weakened. Perhaps there will be increased fighting over control of the smaller businesses of trafficking humans, guns and black market drugs, but there's no reason to believe those markets would grow when drugs are legalized. In fact, we could use the vast savings and tax income from legalization to fund increased enforcement of gun and human trafficking laws.
Perhaps we would experience a spike in other types of black market activity as drug workers struggle to transition once the value of their product is wiped out. But I wouldn't expect a huge increase in violence. Violent criminals are already involved in violence. A change in laws won't spark new violence. This may be a questionable solution for the displaced drug workers, but maybe we could subsidize job transitions and training with the new income from drug taxes. The current generation of drug dealers and traffickers will adjust and age. Starting immediately, children in poor neighborhoods will no longer see drugs one of the few paths to wealth, we can hope that they will take different routes in their lives and pursue other opportunities.
And the money we'd save would be icing. The $20 billion we spend each year on the drug war - that's easy savings. Combine that with the revenue from taxing most of the $60 billion currently spent on drugs, and you've got a windfall big enough to make a serious investment in health care, energy, infrastructure or education.
Shutting down the supply channels in the map above would put quite a few drug traffickers out of work and reshuffle our underground economies. It's impossible to know how that would shake out, but the status quo isn't working, and it's time to look hard at the alternatives.
Share this Post
Related Posts
-
Monday Map: The Distribution of Drug Use
-
Massachusetts Steps Away from Mandatory Minimums
-
The DEA Quietly Updates its Website, and Drug Reformers Score a Victory
Comments (21)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Email



















You completely miss the point.
The drug situation comes from an earlier problem.
All this focus on the drug problem totally misses the real problem because the drug thing is too late on the chain of events that caused the drug situation.
It always starts off with some earlier problem that the person is struggling with that drugs are a solution to.
It can be bad school grades, fights at home, conflicts with peers, emotional upsets with friends or enemies, weak self-respect, and a lot of times boredom and the need for excitement.
No sane, happy person truly succeeding in life turns to drugs such is the stupidity of taking them. The person always has a problem of some kind beforehand. Hundreds and hundreds of people we have rehabbed tell the same story.
The only solution to resolving the drug scene is via proper education, not weirdo scare drama dramatics or useless “dangers of drugs” campaigns.
Getting to kids early enough before the promoters and getting them to understand what drugs are all about is workable as we prove at every school presentation. But even this is not enough on its own. It also needs to be accompanied with help in the other areas such as study problems, friendship problems, getting along with others and most of all helping the individual to discover and/or revitalise their goals and purposes in life so they do not have time to be bored. Everyone has something in which they are or once was interested, many times they are buried by invalidation and ridicule from others. Kids can be very cruel to their own in this area and make others withdraw into a shell. Drugs can become very attractive to a person wiped out by their peers.
Get working in these areas and you will remove the need, interest, reason and desire for drugs and the pushers will have no customers and that is the end of the drug problem in all but for the really stupid. And nobody can save them. One hundred percent solutions to anything are not obtainable. Solutions for the majority certainly are and they are really worth going after.
Posted by Merv Nash on 07/07/2009 @ 05:10AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Merv, what?
People smoke marijuana because they enjoy it, not because they're addicted to it or have "problems at home". There are currently 15 million regular marijuana users in this country, and a further 100 million people (a third of this country) acknowledge that they've obtained and consumed marijuana during the prohibition. You can't seriously say that all of these people smoked marijuana because had "weak self-respect"!
The ONDCP tells us that two thirds of the cartels' profits come solely from marijuana sales in the U.S. Eliminating that cash flow by underpricing the cartels with marijuana legally grown and sold to adults will strip them of their customers, eliminate two thirds of their incomes and bankrupt them.
The result will be an end to the brutal, daily murders they commit, an end to the easy access they're giving kids to marijuana, and an end to the danger that these people put all of us in - smokers and non-smokers alike.
Posted by Jillian Galloway on 07/07/2009 @ 12:41PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
We are allowing 60 billion dollars a year of untaxed American dollars go out of America to foreign entrepreneurs and will continue to do so until we are allowed to grow our own and all the prisons,rehab centers and drug cops in the world won't stop it. And reality is for people that can't handle drugs. And if the education of our children had truthful information about the most commonly used illicit drug,they might believe some of the scary things,but truthful about the really dangerous drugs out there. But no,they show an egg frying in a pan and tell children that that is their brain on marijuana. The child later in life tries pot,and in an instant realizes that he has been lied to,so maybe they were fibbing about the other drugs too.
That is just an example of how our government and the violence supporting anti-drug cartels have based the assault in their war on drugs. And when you tell one lie,it takes 2 to cover it up,even more if your a politician,and it keeps you in practice.
When the government decides to remove the cartels and organized crime from the marijuana market,they either have to remove the market,reduce the demand or destroy the plant.
They have been spraying herbicides in countries all over the world,to no avail. All we have accomplished is to have whole countries hate us because our sprays not only destroyed the marijuna patch,but three legal crops around it,starving the local farmers that were growing legal crops.
Reducing the demand has proven futile,we are going broke building prisons and locking up people for non-violent crimes. Over 800,000 were arrested last year for marijuana and the numbers increase yearly.
Removing the market is the only workable solution I see for the corner we have worked ourselves into. The way is simple and cost the US government not a dime in a stimulus bill. Legalize marijuana and allow the pot smokers to remove the market by growing their own. Anyone that is not able to grow their own because they are too lazy,too busy or just not in a setting where growing is possible will be the tax paying marijuana user that buys from the licensed store. Where ID's are checked to stop underage purchases. To stop the cartels the retail stores will have to sell a good grade of marijuana at a lower price than the cartels can because as Walmart has taught us all,you can put people out of business by selling for less.
So the people wanting to raise large dollars on taxes off marijuana will have to tune that down or they just raise the price where instead of removing the cartels,you help them raise their prices and make more money, and they already have their distribution and sales systems in place.
The real stimulus to our economy comes when we quit allowing 60 billion a year leave this country,but instead it will be put back into our economy by the people when they are no longer handing the money over to a dealer,instead,they are buying manufactured goods and services.
Posted by Norman Gooding on 07/09/2009 @ 09:11PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
The justifications that users and addicts come up with to try to make their habit “legal” are never ending. They get into all sorts of arguments about prisons and dollars and dealers to shift the attention away from their habit.
“It doesn’t do me any harm” is probably one of the favorites. A totally stupid statement as they never notice any difference within themselves so think that nothing has changed. There is a very measurable physical difference in their body never mind the difference in their ability to be rational.
“I enjoy it” follows this pretty closely which is an admission that there was already something wrong with their “normal” state that they had to escape from because playing games, sports or just engaging in pleasurable activities no longer provided any excitement.
All this kind of talk is of course wasted on those that are hooked. This is because the drugs have already altered their mind and rationale and there is no way for them to see it when they are in it.
The only hope for a reduction in drug use is to provide some true data about drugs in a non threatening way for the person to inspect, consider and decide for themselves. Some will see it, some others won’t. Nothing ever works 100%. As long as we can keep the majority sane, strong and with decent values we will still have a workable society that can afford to look after the weak and the sick.
Merv
Posted by Merv Nash on 07/10/2009 @ 03:16AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Sir,
you are speaking out of books you have read,reports made by people skirting life and observing it without actually living it.
Marijuana is a natural herb that as long as man has been here has been used as a medicine and a recreational stimulant.and was banned by the United States because of financial and ethnic reasons,not because it was a drug. When the bill supporters were having trouble getting constituents to support it,it was then attacked as an evil drug,hence "Reefer Madness".
Regardless of the reasons for its tax act,it was not actually illegal until the War on Drugs was declared and the DEA was created.
The fact remains that what ever your opinion is or your beliefs,you have,and no one has the right to tell people what they may or may not "use" as long as they are harming no one. Now come out with some statistics and prove to me that a single person in history has ever died from the USE or consumption of marijuana. Do a search on google or call the DEA or whomever is paying you and see if they have any records of any deaths caused by marijuana. And don't even go to lung damage or cancer,NIDA and the DEA paid for the longest study ever done on marijuana use and lung function,a 30 year study,and found no connection to cancer or COPD. Statistics proved exactly the opposite,that marijuana may be a preventative and treatment for cancer and that smoking just marijuana actually increased lung capacity.
This study was done by a Dr. Tashkin and will not be published because it is actually illegal for the DEA or any government agency to present any information or study that validates any medical uses for marijuana or supports the legalization of marijuana.
When control of the scientific studies on marijuana are taken from the agency that is charged with keeping it illegal,I believe you will change your mind on just how sorry us pot smokers are. And the medicinal uses for marijuana will outweigh all your moralistic ideology and we may be able to save you from you.
Posted by Norman Gooding on 07/10/2009 @ 08:05AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Attempting to minimize drug use is a very noble cause Merv, but it's a long-term effort than can take years to create any significant change and realistically the best you can hope to achieve is a reduction in use, you cannot hope to prevent every one of the millions of drug users in this country from completely using drugs.
The people dying as a result of our prohibition need our help right now. There are more than 3,000 people alive right now who will be tortured, murdered and dismembered before Christmas. The ONLY thing that can save their lives is to bankrupt the cartels by creating a high-quality, low-cost competition to them.
We must stop keeping the marijuana market free from competition and directly compete with the cartels by licensing reputable companies to legally produce and sell marijuana to adults, with prices set too low for the drug dealers and cartels to match.
Posted by Jillian Galloway on 07/10/2009 @ 08:38AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Yes, Jillian I agree, my plan is no instant fix. It is long term but I also know that it is the only long term workable plan I can think of that will finally turn the situation around. Even if slow I do know it works when done well. I wish it was a quick fix but the epidemic has been developing for many, many years so I can’t see any quick fix for it.
Maybe some of your ideas can act as a stop gap until we can get kids and people to get a kick out of life just as people. We find that, without exception, all the clients we get through our rehab come out with a zest for living like they once had before they got hooked. This is because we don’t just dry them out but we rehab their life too and help them find and face the problem that led them into drugs in the first place. It’s a total rehab. Sorry for the commercial but it is only to make the point not to get business.
Thank you for the kind “noble” compliment but it is not from any noble cause I operate, just rational sense and observation of what the rehabilitated clients say and what they then go out and accomplish in life. This is a joy to behold.
Some other user has made a comment and accused me of coming from a moral angle which of course I do not claim and even with the greatest stretch of interpretation can’t be read into my writings. This dramatically and completely proves my point that drugs causes confusion in the mind and the inability to understand and think clearly.
I am truly sorry about all the people whose lives will be cut short for the lack of a one shot fix. The sadness of it is we never got to the people early enough with some true data on the damage drugs do and the PR campaigns of the pushers made it first and have been very effective, such is the power of marketing.
I remember reading an article that was written in the 60’s about this great psychiatrist who had discovered LSD for use as the greatest wonder drug of all time and everybody should take it because it made then feel so great. It was even said to cure alcoholism. The point is it addled the person’s mind and from what I have read about psychiatrists that would be just down their ally. More to the point is it never made any artist produce any better art than they could or did as a sane person. Mind altering drugs alter the mind for goodness sakes, this is what they do. To pretend that they have no effect is a complete oxymoron and boy is that good word to describe a user especially the second syllable. Good luck with your plan.
Posted by Merv Nash on 07/11/2009 @ 03:43AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Because you make your living off people required by a court order to use your services,your livlihood depends on drugs remaining illegal,and your support of the prohibition means that you want to continue spending billions locking people up. These people are your neighbors,relatives and maybe your friends.
With the drug czar's announcement of shifting from incarceration to treatment,your business should be booming soon,so now it is more important than ever that you support prohibition so you can line your pockets from it. That just makes you another parasite from the tax dollar trough,and supporting prohibition supports the violence being caused by the cartels and organized crime.
Please feel free to express all your ideals anywhere you want to,as the people will soon realize that when you speak,is it for the wallet or from the heart?
Posted by Norman Gooding on 07/14/2009 @ 12:32PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
The estimates are that 70% of the cartels income comes from the green market on marijuana,and the striking thing about that figure is that 70% of the DEA's budget is for fighting marijuana. Since the leaders of the DEA are bureaucrats and their budget depends on marijuana remaining illegal,you can expect them to try everything they can to hold on to their piece of the budget pie.
If nothing else comes out of this War on Drugs,we can only hope that America wakes up and removes these agencies that feed off the tax trough and produce no tangible results except the accomplished spending of their budgets.
The DEA uses propaganda to build up support and when they make a "bust",whether the drugs are pure or not,all are reported at street value,hence an ounce of 20% cocaine is reported as pure and the street value is then attached as if you could add cut to the drugs seized as if it was pure. That is why when they report their effectiveness using dollar amounts as a marker,they sound like they are stopping millions of dollars worth of drugs,but the cartels are only losing thousands of dollars on their million dollar bust.
In the seizures of marijuana,they price all marijuana as if it were all Kush or some other exotic strain when in fact it sells on the street for $50 an ounce. Again,the DEA reports millions of dollars busted and the cartels just loses thousands.
The DEA has lied to the American people for so long now that they don't even know the truth anymore and are not interested in finding it.
Posted by Norman Gooding on 07/10/2009 @ 08:56AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Interestingly, Mr. Gooding, the DEA is not only the main enforcement agency of the prohibition, it's also the very agency you must petition to in order to get marijuana rescheduled out of Schedule I.
This is a clear conflict of interest! We have no way to know whether their rejection of *every* petition made to them is being done to protect society or their jobs.
Posted by Jillian Galloway on 07/10/2009 @ 09:45AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Jillian,they are required by law,to refuse to do anything that validates any medical uses for marijuana or supports legalization,which means that even if they wanted to,they can't reschedule marijuana.We are caught in a catch 22 with them.
A bill was passed in 1984 or 85 that makes it illegal for any government agency to do this,and it will have to be repealed before any scientific medical studies are done.
The study by Dr. Tashkin was approved by the DEA because in the outline of the study,Dr Tashkin and the DEA thought that a direct connection with pot smoking and cancer or COPD could be established,they were so sure of it that the DEA paid for the study,for 30 years,but oops,wrong.
The sad part is,that even if the study had proven 100% to cure cancer,the DEA would not release it,and as Dr Tashkin said further studies were required to verify that pot was a cancer preventative,those studies will never be approved,because it's against the law for anyone to approve such a study. The only studies allowed by the DEA are studies that target something harmful or dangerous about marijuana,never the good.
I will search and find that bill so I can list it here because we need to remove that law before we can get enough information for the FDA to approve marijuana as a medicine. Since the FDA is also a government agency,it can't legally approve medical marijuana,no matter what evidence we present.
Posted by Norman Gooding on 07/10/2009 @ 12:00PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Surely restrictive laws like those are harmful to our country?
While other countries can openly discuss marijuana and determine sound policies to control it we're stuck with a rigid policy that is NOT based on science and which can not ever be changed. This gives other countries a strategic advantage over us!
And more than this, the culture that surrounds this policy touches everything in society, it taints the thinking of otherwise extremely intelligent legislators, it divides families, it alienates law-abiding people from the police, it causes suspicion and distrust in our schools and it forces employers to test their employees pee to see what they were doing during the time they weren't at work.
One of the saddest things about this situation is that our fellow citizens won't even see that there's a problem until the cartels establish themselves here properly and truly start shooting, burning and beheading American citizens. It's such a sad indictment on our people. It's like a life is only precious if it's an American life. :(
Posted by Jillian Galloway on 07/10/2009 @ 02:53PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
As we have increased the border security and are now confiscating more of the marijuana as it comes across,the cartels are moving growers into our communities and setting up shop in country,to bypass all that security. With the advancements being made in L.E.D. low heat,low wattage lighting,which reduces air conditioning costs and the big electric bills connected with commercial growing,detection will come only by accident and after the fact,when they leave a rented property full of empty containers with stumps sticking out of them. The expense of growing indoors will be offset by not losing their loads at the border and being able to grow the more exotic strains,widening their market base and increasing their profits. It is going to be very interesting for the next few years,watching the multi-billion dollar cartels give our multi-billion dollar drug warriors headaches.
Posted by Norman Gooding on 07/13/2009 @ 04:50AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
That's true, Norman. As border security increases the cartels are going to have more and more incentive to fully establish themselves in our country.
So far their strength has come from the fact that they've kept a very low profile over here. They don't roam the streets murdering rivals like Al Capone and his gang did during the alcohol prohibition.
Because of this many, many people don't see any harm being caused by the prohibition at all. But the more the cartels move operations over here, the more violence they'll bring with them. There will come a tipping point when the general public demands an end to the violence with whatever way works. Ending the prohibition will be considered a small price to pay.
Hopefully we can speed this process up so the number of murders will be kept to a minimum, but eventually the end of the prohibition is inevitable. I would like to see it happen in my lifetime.
Posted by David Garton on 07/13/2009 @ 05:13AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
If we covered the earth's bare viable real estate with the hemp plant,we would reverse the greenhouse effect,replace pulp wood,allowing forest regeneration,cloth the poor,feed the hungry,reduce oil and coal use,and it would be purty as a bugs ear.
Posted by Norman Gooding on 07/14/2009 @ 12:18PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I support marijuana legalization because I think it is probably the most wrong thing America has ever done to it's self. I don't get a paycheck or expect any monetary gain from the legalization beyond the money I save when I don't have to buy marijuana from the dealers,but grow my own. I support marijuana legalization because I beleive it to be the single most versatile healing herb and useable plant on earth.
Although there are some organizations that support marijuana legalization that have paid positions within their structure,you only see them on TV or hear them on radio.
These forums are full of people that support legalization,not for money,but for the same reasons I have. But the people we see here and on television that support the prohibition are all dependant on the drugs remaining illegal for them to continue making their living.
And that is why we will win!
Posted by Norman Gooding on 07/14/2009 @ 01:06PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Too many people are making a real good living from marijuana being illegal, because they know that if you put two smokers from different sides of town in jail they will network and multiply.Marijuana is available everywhere,and the republicans know it. If they would just STOP and think of the people instead of their friends and big contributors to their campaigns that have a stake in state or federally run correctional institutions. Try spending some of those billions on actually helping the people and not just locking them up. The United States will never win this drug war if its only solution is to lock everybody up. Legalize it and tax it, thats been the american way ever since I can remember. The only question is why is it taking so long.
Posted by Hector Lopez on 07/17/2009 @ 01:52PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
OK - great idea, let's legalize drugs...........
but for whom? everyone? like kids? would there be an age limit? because if not - then a lot of these bad guys would be selling drugs to our kids......that is to say, selling more drugs to children than they do now........
Is the concept here that we should legalize because we can't beat them? is that it? because if it is, then why bother to fight for anything? Why bother to stand up for anything you believe in? Why not legalize Human Trafficking (which incidentally is the fastest growing criminal activity in the world) - let's make it legal to buy and sell people. To keep them captive in misery. Take them away from their famillies and their culture. Beat them. Rape them. Sell them for sex. Sell them for cheap labour. Because we're currently losing that battle as well.
Is that OK with you? Because it isn't with me........
If we're losing the war on drugs - just like when we're losing any other war - then we need to change our strategy, not just give in.........
Why not take a leaf out of Rudy Giuliani's book of zero tollerance - look what he did for New York city in the early '90's.....
but to advocate just giving up..... shame on you
john stack 4th August 2009: johnstack@svetna.com
http://www.svetna.com
Posted by john stack on 08/04/2009 @ 05:17AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
NOBODY is suggesting that children should be allowed to buy drugs John! But the prohibition that you support is making drugs easily available to them today. The illegal drug dealers that kids buy from are there solely because our legal stores aren't allowed to undercut their prices and drive them out of the market.
And if you want to talk about giving up just take a look at our current policy! Instead of competing head-to-head with the dealers, undercutting their prices, stripping them of their customers, eliminating their profits and driving them out of the market, we instead send our law enforcement personnel into our neighborhoods to ELIMINATE their competition! Talk about giving up!! ..what kind of lunatic logic is that based on?!!
Last Wednesday (7/29/09) four young children, the youngest just 7 yrs old and the oldest only 15, were murdered when cartel men came to their house, shot to death their father who was a police commander, shot to death their mother, and then threw grenades into the house killing all four children. This was done because their father in some small way threatened the cartel's drug income.
If you support the prohibition (and you do John) then you support the brutal murder of 7 yr-olds.
Posted by Jillian Galloway on 08/04/2009 @ 07:55AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
An interesting projection Jillian..... that supporting the prohibition of drugs is supporting the murder of 7 yr olds.... I don't quite follow the logic myself.
Are you saying that these 'cartel men' who raided a police commanders house with heavy ordinance killing everyone inside had some kind of justification or right to do so because the police commander was interfeering in some way with their business interests?
and further that I am supporting the deaths of these poor victims because I don't agree that these 'cartel men' should be given free reign to sell drugs on the streets?
Are you suggesting that these criminals should be given free reign? and if they don't sell drugs then what will they switch to? guns? Human Trafficking? Don't you think these people need to be removed from the streets for the protection of the rest of society?
have you actually thought about what you're saying here?
Selling drugs and taking drugs causes huge social problems.
Attacking the home of a police commander and killing him and his familly is somewhere beyond that... don't you think?
just what are you advocating with regard to these killers?
Posted by john stack on 08/04/2009 @ 10:30PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I'm sorry John, I didn't mean to confuse you. If the prohibition actually achieved its goal of preventing people from using marijuana then we wouldn't have a problem. Nobody would use marijuana, the cartels would therefore have nobody to sell it to which would leave them with neither the financial ability nor the incentive to murder in order to protect their marijuana incomes (because of course they wouldn't have any).
But the prohibition doesn't prevent people from using marijuana. Marijuana has been widely used during the entire seventy years of the prohibition. So what the prohibition achieves instead is that it prevents reputable companies from legally competing against the cartels. The cartels make about $13 billion a year from selling marijuana in the U.S. and they kill whomever they think they have to in order to guarantee the continuity of this income. Last year the cartels murdered more than 6,000 people in order to protect their drug incomes, and so far this year they've killed 4,000 already and will murder about 3,000 more before Christmas.
This is the outcome of the prohibition that you support. The options for people like you are either to make it work and eliminate marijuana use from this country, or continue supporting it knowing that it doesn't achieve its goal of preventing marijuana from being used in this country and therefore it does directly lead to the deaths of thousands of people.
As the last seventy years have shown us, it is physically impossible to prevent marijuana from being used in this country, therefore the only logical, humane and effective solution is to license reputable businesses to legally produce and sell marijuana to adults at prices too low for the cartels to match. This will immediately take from the cartels all of their adult customers and leave them with so little income from minors that they'll be forced out of business. As the cartels make two-thirds of their incomes solely from marijuana sales in the U.S. ending this source of income will decimate them and permanently end the murders they're committing.
So, how are you following the logic this time John? Since you appear to be a diehard supporter of the prohibition I'd really like to hear how you're going to make it achieve its goal of eliminating marijuana use in this country when that goal has so completely eluded us for the last seventy years.
Posted by Jillian Galloway on 08/05/2009 @ 09:29AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.