Seven Ways Obama Can Reduce Gun Violence
Published November 12, 2008 @ 05:11AM PT

More on guns!
Writing on the Huffington Post, Massachusetts real estate developer and non-profit founder John Rosenthal lists seven ways President-elect Obama can act to reduce gun violence:
#1 Mandatory criminal background checks for all gun sales
#2 Require responsible and safe gun storage for all firearms unless they are in the owners direct control
#3 Allow Law Enforcement to maintain and share critical "crime-gun" trace data
#4 Restore and improve the Federal Ban on Assault Weapons
#5 Repeal the Federal law giving Immunity to the gun industry
#6 Enact National Consumer Product Safety Commission regulations for firearms
#7 Create incentives for the gun industry to make "personalized guns"
Hat tip: CrimProf Blog
Share this Post
Comments (11)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Email



















#1 Already done, it's called an NICS check. Why does this repeatedly come up when it's already in practice? You guys already won this issue so drop it.
#2 How is this going to be enforced? Regular surprise visits by law enforcement using info from #3?#3 Several privacy issues come to mind here. Also, there is a well documented history as to why this is a really bad idea. Ask the gun owning residents of european countries during the blitzkrieg. Those guys disappeared first because their governments kept those types of records.#4 Sure, right after you repeal the Second Amendment. Has any consideration been given to what the people in this country want. Start at the district level...that's what democracy is about. If the public wants it, they will tell their representatives. However, there is not support for doing this.
#5 Immunity to what? Being sued by victims of gun violence? Slippery slope argument that sets a bad precedence for more than just the gun industry. If you guys really what to go down that road let me know so I can get my Law degree. While you're at it I'd like to stop tort reform...I might as well get rich off of other people's bad decision making.
#6 Your going to need to expound on this point.
#7 Why not, I like a good engraving job to pretty up a gun as much as anyone. Kidding. I assume your talking biometrics. I'm all for electronic wizardry. Just make sure it's 100% fail-safe. Nothing worse than picking up your gun to protect against that pesky home invasion only to find the batteries are dead.
Posted by Jeff B on 11/12/2008 @ 04:35PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I have a simple solution to the gun violence and killing epidemic in America: repeal the 2nd Amendment or rewrite it so guns are banned in America to all but law enforcement and the military. That will take care of the web of ineffective and confounding gun control laws. America's mentality is still in the Wild West. We are now witnessing history with the election of Barack Obama as first African American President of the United States. Will we witness a more peaceful America? I can only pray for such enlightenment.
Posted by Shelley Gilbert on 11/14/2008 @ 08:03PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Behold, the second amendment as ratified by the Senate and the House. The founders wanted to ensure the rights of "a well regulated militia" as well as "the right of the people"! It was implicitly stated to guarantee through law, the people of the United States would have the right to bear arms, not just the militia. This is because they had just finished fighting a war against a well regulated militia, and wanted to leave open the possibility of having to do it again! REPEAL THE SECOND AMENDMENT OR REWRITE IT? Has this country really gone to pot, has this country forgotten Jeffersonian Principles. Regardless, this issue is not one of Executive, Legislative or Judicial...this is a States Rights issue! The founders insisted in an equal but separate three tier Federal Government, as well as separate State V.s. Federal Governments! If you or anyone out there wants the federal government whether the Judicial, Legislative or the President himself to right and dictate policy without the vote of the people or any consideration for the individual states rights and policies, then I got a sweet little island for you to live on 90 miles south of Miami... CUBA! Sure lets repeal and rewrite, how about the first, second, oh why not all the amendments until they fit our new child proof, idiot proof world. Our inalienable rights are what make this country strong. Stop to think why NO one or country has ever tried to invade this Great Nation! It might have a little do do with our ability as citizens to own guns. Besides, if guns are abolished are you going to ban swords, knives, clubs, rocks, FISTS? People need to stop blaming the instrument for the result. A gun left to itself is a paperweight. A gun in the hands of a responsible citizen is a guarantee of freedom and safety. Illegal guns are the problem, not legal. I am all for the regulation of fire arms, only to the point of insuring those who BUY them are of good legal standing. What makes anyone think by taking legal guns away, they can stop illegal guns from getting to the streets. This country has a drug enforcement agency, an entire agency devoted to getting illegal drugs off the street. How has that been going? Drugs still out there, yet no one is allowed to legally possess cocaine, crack, heroine. No one to blame there? If we did a better job getting disfunctional citizens off the street, then we would see less crimes all together, let alone gun crimes. Stop and think, we are supposed to have a government FOR THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE, not FOR THE PEOPLE, BY THE FED! Promote safe and responsible gun ownership, don't strip your own rights away one at a time. If you do not pay attention, all your rights will be gone, and you won't know why.
Posted by david karos on 02/14/2009 @ 09:03AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Ok, very interesting points and I can see your point, for example.
#1) Currently for the most part there is a background check but it is very weak and not standard scross the states, for example here in Florida a lot of individuals who qualify for guns would not quality for funs in most other states.
Also, Doctors for example have to disclose information to the Department of Transportation for medical conditions or medication that should keep this individual from Driving, why is this not the case for Gun Owners, if you are taking certain medication then perhaps that individuals gun ownership is dangerose to others.
#2) Easy, they are required to store the guns safely. Leaving the responsability to the owner, if a gun is stolen from you or someone gets injured or killed because of the lack of fun safe storage then that individual is responsable of what happens. Why exemt this individuals from guilt as it is happening now.
#3) I guess I need clarification on this, not sure what that would mean.
#4) This is just common sense
#5) This would be great, at the moment there is no encouragement for the gun manufacturers to make guns safer instead of otherwise.
#6) That would be great, Im sure a lot of people fear this but this doesnt mean that guns will be taken off the street but there will be some sort of organization to keep guns under control
#7) That would be cool
Posted by Frank Houston on 11/15/2008 @ 01:09PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Shelly,
As just Scalia pointed out in District V. Heller, the 2nd amendment does not define a right. It just explicitly says that a pre-existing right "shall not be infringed."
At this point, I would feel the need to remind both Republicans and Democrats alike (and the supreme court), about the 9th amendment.
Oh yeah, don't forget the 10th.... and 14th!
Besides, gun restrictions only make law abiding people easy targets. I will again remind everyone to compare the crime rates in cold war era Switzerland and Jamaica.
Gun restrictions do not reduce crime. We would no more be able to keep illegal guns off the street than we can keep illegal drugs off the street.
Furthermore, would you support a ban on cars because a small number of criminals use them in serious crimes?
Posted by Mark H on 11/16/2008 @ 08:58PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
#1 Mandatory criminal background checks for all gun salesAlready there. I will give you credit for not suggesting that there is some law that somehow does not apply when you are inside a gun show. There isn't.
#2 Require responsible and safe gun storage for all firearms unless they are in the owners direct controlCorrect me if I am wrong, but didn't District V. Heller explicitly strike this down?
#3 Allow Law Enforcement to maintain and share critical "crime-gun" trace dataThey already do that. I suppose that this is a veilled reference to the Tiahrt Amendment. Law enforcement can access everything their heart's desire. The only thing this does is prevent antigun groups to troll through the data. Any suggestion otherwise is just false.
#4 Restore and improve the Federal Ban on Assault WeaponsWow... let's see. The assault weapons ban, like all gun control, did not reduce crime. Furthermore, the weapons covered by the original ban are used in less than 1% of gun crime.
#5 Repeal the Federal law giving Immunity to the gun industrySee the comments about the Tiahrt Amendment.
If a drunk driver kills someone, the car company is not at fault.
#6 Enact National Consumer Product Safety Commission regulations for firearmsWhy? I do not recall reading a single news story about defective guns being a problem.
Perhaps the real reason is to drive up the cost of gun ownership? Maybe harass gun makers? So, only rich people can defend themselves, hunt, and participate in gun sports.
Wow, that reminds me of the jim crow era obsticles put in place to prevent minorities from voting.
#7 Create incentives for the gun industry to make "personalized guns"No problem with incentives, as long as it isn't my tax money being used.
Posted by Mark H on 11/16/2008 @ 09:14PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Guns kill people like spoons make people fat!. Its the idiot behind the trigger that kills people. You guys are retarded if you think banning guns will keep people from killing each other. Remember, anything is a weapon if you hold it just right.
Posted by Mike McCausley on 11/29/2008 @ 05:14PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
There is only one simple way to deal with gun violence: #1. Ban guns from the general public in America. This is the only thing that will work. Nothing else works.
Posted by Shelley Gilbert on 11/30/2008 @ 05:24AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Still however does not solve the problem of illegal guns in the US, it just takes them out of the hands of law-abiding citizens
Posted by Matt Hilend on 10/08/2009 @ 07:04PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Right Shelley, like that will ever happen. Lets just ban violent stupid people instead, that would solve all of our problems.
Posted by Mike McCausley on 11/30/2008 @ 07:57PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Well the first thing Obama could do is look at the facts and not these 2nd amendment raping ideas.
First of all criminals get guns the way criminals do anything else, illegally. Unregistered, illegal guns are the ones generally used in violent crime. Creating more restrictions only places the weight on the law-abiding responsible citizen.
MANDATORY CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECKS ARE ALREADY IN USE, by law any gun sold in these United States without one is an illegal sale.
Safe gun storage is useful, and a good idea, keeping a gun out of it's gun safe or safe hiding place is like having a knife out of the drawer.
Law enforcement already gathers data on guns it has and uses, this is a moot point.
The assault weapons ban does the exact same thing as tightening the restrictions, as previously stated the weapons in question (also most likely obtained illegally) were used in less than 1% of gun violence. This is simply another act to take a way the citizen's Constitutional right, one clearly spelled out.
Immunity to the gun industry is common sense, it should go without saying that these are sold as WEAPONS. These weapons when sold assume responsible use and anything beyond that is fault of the buyer/wielding party of the weapon. This protects from frivalous litigation.
Gun safety is an important issue, and possibly the most important in this because it is the only common sense one. A person who does not know and practice responsible gun safety, use and handling should not own a gun.
Personalized guns are a nice idea, but I will not waste my tax dollars on added digital folly to an already high functioning and high performing machine.
Posted by Matt Hilend on 02/14/2009 @ 10:28AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.