Welcome Uncertain, Success Essential
Published September 20, 2009 @ 12:30PM PT

A great column in Friday's Washington Post by former George W. Bush speechwriter Michael Gerson makes the most compelling case I've heard in a while for post-incarceration services.
In less than 800 words, Gerson lays out a clear case for federal and state governments to act swiftly and strongly to provide services to the 600,000 people we release from prison each year, from expansion of the federal Second Chance Act to approval and support for the small state programs that make a break new lives. Coming from a conservative like Gerson, the case is particularly powerful.
Gerson employs Chicago's Humboldt Park as the setting for his column, and speaks with a man named James Riddle who recently walked out of prison at age 42 after serving half his life behind bars. "Most people say you are welcome," Riddle told Gerson about his return to society. "but you are not really welcome. You are a burden."
Gerson goes on to argue for an expansion of federal investment in the Second Chance Act, saying post-release programming is expensive, but not as expensive as incarceration."It is the sort of needed spending that should unite the parties," he writes.
There's not anything particularly new in the column, but we'll take a compelling case in a major media platform from a prominent conservative anytime we can get it. Read for yourself here.
And learn more about the Second Chance Act from a prisoner's perspective in Michael Santos' post here.
Share this Post
Related Posts
Comments (1)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Email




















One interesting thing about this article, at least to me, was the comments. Most of the readers commenting on the article were, not so much critical of the premise, but critical of the author solely because he was a former member of the Bush Administration. Rather than use the support of this author to help further the cause of reform, his "right" to make comments of this nature are challenged. This is lunacy.
Matt has it right, as usual, when he says that "There's not anything particularly new in the column, but we'll take a compelling case in a major media platform from a prominent conservative anytime we can get it."
Posted by Thomas Kinney on 09/20/2009 @ 04:05PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.